EveryBabyNames

Woodford

1 country#8910 in United States, 2025

Published by the EveryBabyNames data team · data last verified

US
#8910
in United States, 2025
Total births recorded
578
Peak year (United States)
1916
Peak-year count
28
First recorded
1911

Popularity over time in 🇺🇸 United States

Woodford’s recorded births by year, scaled to its own peak year.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Country by country

🇺🇸 United States

578 births recorded 1911–2025 · currently #8910 · peaked in 1916 with 28 births

Most common in: Kentucky, Alabama

Source: Social Security Administration, official birth-registration data

United States rank history

Woodford’s rank among boys’ names, most recent 20 years on record.

YearRankvs. prior yr
1941#2656—
1942#1946↑710
1943#2182↓236
1944#2195↓13
1945#2393↓198
1946#2271↑122
1947#2498↓227
1948#2788↓290
1949#2802↓14
1950#3681↓879
1952#2680↑1001
1954#3176↓496
1955#3505↓329
1958#2642↑863
1963#4048↓1406
1964#4039↑9
1969#4404↓365
2022#9823↓5419
2023#12239↓2416
2025#8910↑3329

Frequently asked questions about Woodford

Is Woodford a popular name?

Yes — Woodford currently ranks #8910 among boys’ names in United States as of 2025, based on official birth records.

Is Woodford more common for boys or girls?

Woodford is recorded predominantly as a boys’ name in official United States birth data.

When was Woodford most popular?

Woodford peaked in 1916 in United States, with 28 recorded births that year.

Is Woodford rising or falling in popularity?

In United States, Woodford’s popularity is falling — its rank has slipped from #1740 in 1911 to #8910 in 2025.

How many babies have been named Woodford?

At least 578 babies have been recorded with the name Woodford across official birth statistics in 1 country.

What names are similar in popularity to Woodford?

Based on real 2025 ranking data in United States, names ranked closest to Woodford include Winfield.

Similar names right now

Ranked directly next to Woodford in United States, 2025 — a real popularity match, not a subjective list.